Directory Submit:
Anaximander Directory List
add url directory
ASR Search Engine
How health do you want depend on how much to you do to your body. Only you take care of them then they will give you health back.
Saturday, 22 June 2013
Thursday, 20 June 2013
Heart Disease is the number one cause of death
Heart Disease is the number one cause of death
Kown your signs and symptoms
- Chest discomfort
- discomfort in other areas of the upper body
- Shortness of breath
- Cold sweat,nausea, or light headedness
Five steps to avoiding heart diseases
- 1. Don't smoke or use tobacco products
- 2. Get active
- 3. Eat a heart- health diet
- 4. Maintain a health weight
- 5. Get regular health screenings
The Season for Change from inside out
The Season for Change from inside out
- A Fresh Clear Start
- Live Health, Live Long
- It's not a diet, It's a lifestyle
- Muscle Dictates Metabolism
Check the full story :
Wednesday, 19 June 2013
“If it’s so great, then why isn’t it in all the stores???”
Good topic --
“If it’s so great, then why isn’t it in all the stores???”
An internet friend of mine, in a discussion about a health product he was recently introduced to, asked:
If this product is so good, and is really “the most powerful antioxidant in the world” as its sellers claim, then why isn’t it produced to be sold in stores?
ANSWER:
Your question is fundamentally flawed.
First of all, Innovative new products can’t just start out being sold in stores. There is competition for limited shelf space. There are relationships with wholesalers that have to be cultivated and convinced before they will distribute a product. There is FDA approval. You’ve heard stories of upstart entrepreneurs selling their product out the back of their station wagons, building a clientele, growing their business bit by bit. That’s why.
If today, you developed a product that you wanted sold, the smartest strategy would be to use “word of mouth marketing”
through independent distributors. You can make more money, cut out the middle man (the stores) and go directly to the consumer.
So, to use a product’s availability in major, well-established, cut-throat competitive chains and supermarkets as a determinant of its effectiveness or credibility is not wise.
Furthermore, your question presumes that mainstream companies that sell to supermarkets are in the business of making people healthy and better. They are not. These companies (think Kelloggs, Kraft Foods, etc.) are and remain in business selling products at a profit, and generating repeat customers who get hooked on their products. That’s why there is sugar in table salt (look at the ingredients in Morton Table Salt in the US), sweeteners in soda, preservatives, MSG and other unnecessary, harmful and addictive ingredients in many products you find on supermarket shelves.
There is little that is sold in supermarkets that is really “good” for you. (Personally, the only thing I buy in supermarkets are toilet paper and bottled water. I get everything else from farmers markets and organic health food stores, or directly from the tree when I’m on Saipan)
To mass market a product requires that there be a viable profit margin selling your product at a price the masses find reasonable. The majority of items sold in supermarkets, therefore, are essentially garbage because they can be produced at low cost using inferior industrially-farmed, mass produced, genetically modified ingredients, sold at a low cost to fit within the budget of the widest audience.
It is a flaw to use widespread availability as a determinant for a product’s health effectiveness.
Your statement also presumes that the overall thrust of the FDA (Food and Drug Administration)–as well as the medical profession in general– is to cure illness. It is not. Similar to food companies, the prime directive is to keep people unhealthy so that their income through the peddling of pharmaceutical drugs is maintained.
The Gerson Therapy is outlawed in the US BECAUSE it cures cancer. Hydrogren Peroxide, DMSO, clay, etc. are all downplayed as miracle cures BECAUSE they are, and are easily accessible by the public. There is a war against nutritional supplements for the same reason.
It is a flaw to rely on medical acceptance and government support as a determinant for a product’s health effectiveness.
So, to answer your question:
It may be precisely BECAUSE it is so valuable that you will NOT see it in supermarkets. The moment you DO see such a product in a supermarket at a “reasonable” priced, that ’s when you can be sure that (a) the original manufacturers have sold it to a larger concern who may have changed the production/growing process and stripped it of its original value in order to make a profit, and/or (b) lower cost inferior ingredients are being used towards that same goal. (This is what people are saying happened to Solgar, Burts Bees, Tom’s of Maine, and other brands. See
http://newhope360.com/managing-your-business/nbty-buys-solgar-115-million
and
http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_17306.cfm
I could go on, but the reason things don’t seem to make sense is because your paradigm is flawed.
Did you know that lightbulbs can be manufactured to last longer? Did you know that rubber car tires and component parts of electronics can be made not to wear out as quickly as they do? Your question is similar to asking “If those lightbulbs and tires can really last longer, then why aren’t those sold in stores?
or
“If there were really UFOs in existence, then why isn’t it mainstream news?”
This is an ordered and predictable universe that conforms to specific laws. Everything makes sense if you have the correct understanding. And your life, other people, the world and your place within it can make sense if you have the right belief system. Check out a belief system that can help you make sense of things at http://www.livingtruetoyourself.com
W
“If it’s so great, then why isn’t it in all the stores???”
If this product is so good, and is really “the most powerful antioxidant in the world” as its sellers claim, then why isn’t it produced to be sold in stores?
ANSWER:
Your question is fundamentally flawed.
First of all, Innovative new products can’t just start out being sold in stores. There is competition for limited shelf space. There are relationships with wholesalers that have to be cultivated and convinced before they will distribute a product. There is FDA approval. You’ve heard stories of upstart entrepreneurs selling their product out the back of their station wagons, building a clientele, growing their business bit by bit. That’s why.
If today, you developed a product that you wanted sold, the smartest strategy would be to use “word of mouth marketing”
through independent distributors. You can make more money, cut out the middle man (the stores) and go directly to the consumer.
So, to use a product’s availability in major, well-established, cut-throat competitive chains and supermarkets as a determinant of its effectiveness or credibility is not wise.
Furthermore, your question presumes that mainstream companies that sell to supermarkets are in the business of making people healthy and better. They are not. These companies (think Kelloggs, Kraft Foods, etc.) are and remain in business selling products at a profit, and generating repeat customers who get hooked on their products. That’s why there is sugar in table salt (look at the ingredients in Morton Table Salt in the US), sweeteners in soda, preservatives, MSG and other unnecessary, harmful and addictive ingredients in many products you find on supermarket shelves.
There is little that is sold in supermarkets that is really “good” for you. (Personally, the only thing I buy in supermarkets are toilet paper and bottled water. I get everything else from farmers markets and organic health food stores, or directly from the tree when I’m on Saipan)
To mass market a product requires that there be a viable profit margin selling your product at a price the masses find reasonable. The majority of items sold in supermarkets, therefore, are essentially garbage because they can be produced at low cost using inferior industrially-farmed, mass produced, genetically modified ingredients, sold at a low cost to fit within the budget of the widest audience.
It is a flaw to use widespread availability as a determinant for a product’s health effectiveness.
Your statement also presumes that the overall thrust of the FDA (Food and Drug Administration)–as well as the medical profession in general– is to cure illness. It is not. Similar to food companies, the prime directive is to keep people unhealthy so that their income through the peddling of pharmaceutical drugs is maintained.
The Gerson Therapy is outlawed in the US BECAUSE it cures cancer. Hydrogren Peroxide, DMSO, clay, etc. are all downplayed as miracle cures BECAUSE they are, and are easily accessible by the public. There is a war against nutritional supplements for the same reason.
It is a flaw to rely on medical acceptance and government support as a determinant for a product’s health effectiveness.
So, to answer your question:
It may be precisely BECAUSE it is so valuable that you will NOT see it in supermarkets. The moment you DO see such a product in a supermarket at a “reasonable” priced, that ’s when you can be sure that (a) the original manufacturers have sold it to a larger concern who may have changed the production/growing process and stripped it of its original value in order to make a profit, and/or (b) lower cost inferior ingredients are being used towards that same goal. (This is what people are saying happened to Solgar, Burts Bees, Tom’s of Maine, and other brands. See
http://newhope360.com/managing-your-business/nbty-buys-solgar-115-million
and
http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_17306.cfm
I could go on, but the reason things don’t seem to make sense is because your paradigm is flawed.
Did you know that lightbulbs can be manufactured to last longer? Did you know that rubber car tires and component parts of electronics can be made not to wear out as quickly as they do? Your question is similar to asking “If those lightbulbs and tires can really last longer, then why aren’t those sold in stores?
or
“If there were really UFOs in existence, then why isn’t it mainstream news?”
This is an ordered and predictable universe that conforms to specific laws. Everything makes sense if you have the correct understanding. And your life, other people, the world and your place within it can make sense if you have the right belief system. Check out a belief system that can help you make sense of things at http://www.livingtruetoyourself.com
W
Saturday, 15 June 2013
Cellphone Safety using tips:
Cellphone Safety using tips:
- Use left ear to answer the phone
- When phone’s Signal is low to last bar, don’t answer the phone, because the radiation is 1000 times stronger.
- never hold the phone against your head for longer than 5 minutes at a time,
- never wear the phone(switched on or off)closer than 3cms to your body,
- never EVER let children under 15 use a mobile phone,
- never sleep with a mobile phone within 3 metres of your head etc etc.
Solution:
Cellphone use similar frequency as MicroWave. Cellphone network just like put us around the microwave.
Maybe you will find many articles saying phone harmless, but more and more will tell you radiation will bring some side effect to our body. Especial for the brain. The phone is now use much more and much longer than before. It not just for talking and now it is with smartphone application, Let me can't live without cell phone.
How to use the phone safely are more and more important. Believe it or not let you to judge for yourself.
How to use the phone safely are more and more important. Believe it or not let you to judge for yourself.
Thursday, 13 June 2013
Just watched TV few days ago and find the topic about high hill shoes risk.
Just watched TV few days ago and find the topic about high hill shoes risk.
CNN news:
The real price of your footwear
High heels are hell. We all know that. Teetering around on them can cause ankle sprains and breaks; bunions, hammertoes, and stress fractures; as well as tendinitis, plantar fasciitis, and ligament damage.
While statistics linking injuries to a specific shoe don't exist, the AAOS reports that more than 7 out of 10 women have developed a bunion or other painful foot deformity; 9 out of 10 women's foot deformities can be tied to bad shoes.
And the problems don't end at your ankles. A study last year found that women who regularly wore high heels had shorter calf muscles and stiffer, thicker Achilles tendons.
Another study found that prolonged wearing of high heels can contribute to joint degeneration and knee osteoarthritis, which may help explain why osteoarthritis is twice as common in women as in men.
"Any time you stop the foot from performing normally, and a high-heeled shoe does a perfect job of locking up the foot, it's going to increase the forces up the chain," says Casey Kerrigan, M.D., one of the first researchers to study the effects of high heels on the knees.
Heels also throw your body's alignment out of whack. "When you wear heels, you change your center of balance, leading to increased curvature of your back," says Judy F. Baumhauer, M.D., an orthopedic surgeon and president of the AOFAS.
This can lead to the discs in your spine breaking down, as well as muscle spasms and pain throughout the body, and yes, maybe even chronic headache or migraines.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)